Keywords
significant extent
significant effects
Supreme Court
violation of substantive law
social harmfulness of an act
How to Cite
Abstract
The subject of the commentary is the judgment of the Supreme Court of 30 May 2023 (II KK 631/22) overturning the judgment of the appellate court. The author agrees with the view of the Supreme Court and focuses on the interpretative problem concerning two elements of crime, i.e., the significant effects and extent. A distinction is made between these two concepts. The proposed interpretation is based on views held by the legal scholars. The author uses the criterion of how the message is received. The conclusions state the variety of possible effects of incitement to crime, which should be examined in concreto.
References
Budyn-Kulik M., w: Kodeks wykroczeń. Komentarz, red. P. Daniluk, Warszawa 2023.
Ćwiąkalski Z., Kodeks karny. Część szczególna, t. 2, cz. 2, Komentarz do art. 212–277d, red. W. Wróbel, A. Zoll, Warszawa 2017.
Gruszecka D., w: Kodeks karny. Część szczególna. Komentarz, red. J. Giezek, Warszawa 2021.
Krajnik S., w: Kodeks wykroczeń. Komentarz, red. J. Lachowski, Warszawa 2021.
Marek A., Kodeks karny. Komentarz, Warszawa 2010.
Piórkowska-Flieger J., w: Kodeks wykroczeń. Komentarz aktualizowany, red. T. Bojarski, Warszawa 2023.
Zasięg, w: Słownik języka polskiego PWN, < https://sjp.pwn.pl/ >.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Cracow Institute of Criminal Law Foundation