Jurysdykcja ekstraterytorialna w prawie wykroczeń (analiza porównawcza)
PDF (Angielski)

Słowa kluczowe

jurisdiction
misdemeanour law
petty crimes

Jak cytować

Zając, D. (2024). Jurysdykcja ekstraterytorialna w prawie wykroczeń (analiza porównawcza). Czasopismo Prawa Karnego I Nauk Penalnych, 28(1−2), 113-136. https://doi.org/10.60677/CPKiNP2024.1-2.5

Abstrakt

Legal regulation is increasingly the basis for functioning in the modern world. Driving a car or carrying out construction work safely are no longer naturally evolved. They are defined through norms of law. Increasingly, states are using misdemeanour law to enforce it – not to condemn evil, but to discipline individuals.

These developments are accompanied by the processes of globalisation. There has been a move towards the standardisation of national legal systems, particularly in the area of regulation. In a world based on the free movement of goods and services, standardised procedures for constructing buildings or driving a car make it easier to function.

Against this background, the question arises to what extent misdemeanour law has acquired the value of a transnational liability regime. Is it possible to punish misdemeanours committed abroad? Is it possible to speak of a conventional misdemeanour in the same way as one speaks of a criminal offence? This thesis seeks to answer these questions.

The subsequent argumentation is divided into five parts. The first characterises the class of misdemeanours as specific types of sanctionable acts. The second part addresses the issue of misdemeanour jurisdiction in the context of the limits of state authority.

The third part contains comparative legal analyses, covering regulations relating to misdemeanours jurisdiction contained in eight legal systems. The fourth is devoted to the issue of a convention-based penalisation of a misdemeanour. The fifth section discusses the problem of the cross-border effectiveness of the penalties imposed.

PDF (Angielski)

Bibliografia

Aebi M., Linde A., Long-Term Trends in Crime: Continuity and Change, in: The Oxford Handbook of the History of Crime and Criminal Justice, eds. P. Knepper, A. Johansen, New York 2016.

Alkoholverbot in Bus und Bahn, “morgenpost.de”, July 14th, 2013, < https://www.morgenpost.de/printarchiv/berlin/article118019337/Alkoholverbot-in-Bus-und-Bahn.html >.

Ambos K., Punishment without a Sovereign? The Ius Puniendi Issue of International Criminal Law: A First Contribution towards a Consistent Theory of International Criminal Law, “Oxford Journal of Legal Studies” 2013, Vol. 33, No. 2.

Ambos K., Treatise on International Criminal Law: Volume I: Foundations and General Part, Oxford–New York 2021.

Ashworth A., Zedner L., Preventive Justice, Oxford 2014.

Bassiouni M.C., The Penal Characteristics of Conventional International Criminal Law, “Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law” 1983, Vol. 15.

Bradley C.A., Kelley J.G., The Concept of International Delegation, “Law and Contemporary Problems” 2008, Vol. 71, No. 1.

Brooks T., Retribution, in: The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Science of Punishment, eds. F. Focquaert, E. Shaw, B.N. Waller, New York–Milton Park–Abingdon–Oxon 2020.

Canton R., Theories of Punishment, in: The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Science of Punishment, eds. F. Focquaert, E. Shaw, B.N. Waller, New York–Milton Park–Abingdon–Oxon 2020.

Dellavalle S., Paradigms of Social Order: From Holism to Pluralism and Beyond, Palgrave Macmillan 2021.

Dodge W.S., Understanding the Presumption against Extraterritoriality, “Berkeley Journal of International Law” 1998, Vol. 16.

Dubber M.D., Histories of Crime and Criminal Justice and the Historical Analysis of Criminal Law, in: The Oxford Handbook of the History of Crime and Criminal Justice, eds. P. Knepper, A. Johansen, New York 2016.

Dubber M.D., Hörnle T., The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Law, Oxford 2016.

Duff R.A., Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law, Oxford– Portland 2007.

Duff R.A., Green S., Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law, Oxford–New York 2011.

Fletcher G.P., Basic Concepts of Criminal Law, New York 1998.

Foucault M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Vintage 2012.

Gallant K.S., The Protective Principle, in: International Criminal Jurisdiction: Whose Law Must We Obey?, ed. K.S. Gallant, Oxford University Press 2022.

Gorski S., Individuals in International Law, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law, Oxford University Press 2011.

Green L., The Authority of the State, Oxford–New York 1990.

Harcourt B.E., Mill’s On Liberty and the Modern “Harm to Others” Principle, in: Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law, ed. M.D. Dubber, Oxford 2014.

Hart H.L.A., Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. Punishment and Responsibility, Oxford University Press 2008.

Heinze A., Fyfe S., The Normative Framework of Preliminary Examinations, in: Quality Control in Preliminary Examination: Volume 2, eds. M. Bergsmo, C. Stahn, Brussels 2018.

Hildebrandt M., Justice and Police: Regulatory Offenses and the Criminal Law, “New Criminal Law Review” 2009, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1 January.

Hoffman S.J., Baral P., Rogers Van Katwyk S., Sritharan L., Hughsam M., Randhawa H., Lin G. et al., International Treaties Have Mostly Failed to Produce Their Intended Effects, “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” 2022, Vol. 119, No. 32, 9 August.

Hörnle T., PJA von Feuerbach and His Textbook of the Common Penal Law, in: Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law, ed. M.D. Dubber, Oxford 2014.

Husak D., Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law, Oxford 2009.

Iancu B., Legislative Delegation: The Erosion of Normative Limits in Modern Constitutionalism, Berlin–Heidelberg 2014.

Jackson R.M., Common Law Misdemeanors, “The Cambridge Law Journal” 1937, Vol. 6, No. 2.

Kelly E.I., The Limits of Blame: Rethinking Punishment and Responsibility, Cambridge 2018.

Klabbers J., International Law, Cambridge 2013.

Klip A., European Criminal Law, 4th Ed: An Integrative Approach, Cambridge–Antwerp– Chicago 2021.

Knox J.H., A Presumption Against Extrajurisdictionality, “American Journal of International Law” 2010, Vol. 104, No. 3.

Kohler-Hausmann I., Managerial Justice and Mass Misdemeanors, “Stanford Law Review” 2014, Vol. 66, No. 3.

Linklater A., Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era, Polity 2004.

Mavany M., Das Strafrecht als Instrument der Sicherheitsverwaltung?!, in: Die Verwaltung der Sicherheit: Theorie und Praxis der Öffentlichen Sicherheitsverwaltung, eds. H.-J. Lange, M. Wendekamm, Heidelberg 2018.

Mill J.S., On Liberty, < https://www.gutenberg.org/files/34901/34901-h/34901-h.htm >.

O’Keefe R., International Criminal Law, Oxford University Press 2015.

Pave C., Divided Sovereignty: International Institutions and the Limits of State Authority, Oxford–New York 2014.

Sattar A., Criminal Punishment and Human Rights: Convenient Morality, London Routledge 2019.

Satzger H., International and European Criminal Law, München–Oxford–Baden-Baden 2017.

Simester A., von Hirsch, A., Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation, Oxford 2011.

Simester A.P., Is Strict Liability Always Wrong?, in: Appraising Strict Liability, ed. A.P. Si- mester, Oxford University Press 2005.

Simester, A., Preface, in: Appraising Strict Liability, ed. A.P. Simester, Oxford University Press 2005.

Spencer J.R., Pedain A., Approaches to Strict and Constructive Liability in Continental Criminal Law, in: Appraising Strict Liability, ed. A.P. Simester, Oxford University Press 2005.

Thomas Petersen S., Why Criminalize? – New Perspectives on Normative Principles of Criminalization, Cham 2020.

Thorburn M., The Radical Orthodoxy of Hart’s Punishment and Responsibility, in: Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law, ed. M.D. Dubber, Oxford 2014.

Troitiño D.R., Kerikmäe T., de la Guardia R.M., Pérez Sánchez G.Á., The EU in the 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities for the European Integration Process, Springer Nature 2020.

Valverde M., O’Malley P., Foucault, Criminal Law, and the Governmentalization of the State, in: Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law, ed. M.D. Dubber, Oxford 2014.

Vormbaum T., A Modern History of German Criminal Law, ed. M. Bohlander, Berlin 2014.

Wood D.P., Paul J.R., Baker S.A., Bilder R.B., Wojcik M.E., Brunnée J., The Internationalization of Domestic Law: The Shrinking Domaine Réservé, “Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law)”, Vol. 87, Challenges to International Governance, n.d.

Zając D., The Method of Interpretation of Penal Norms in the International Context, Kraków 2019.

Ziegler K., Domaine Réservé, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, eds. A. Peters, R. Wolfrum, < https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1398 >.

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Krakowski Instytut Prawa Karnego Fundacja

Pobrano

##plugins.themes.healthSciences.displayStats.noStats##